ORIGINAL UK RESEARCH

The expensive route is rarely expensive by accident

We use World Bank records and our own provider checks to find where the extra pounds go. Some differences come from cash networks or thin currency markets. Others look much more like pricing power.

DATA EDITION

Why a poorer destination can cost 72% more

UK services to low-income countries cost more on average, but India and Pakistan complicate the tidy explanation. We examine 791 service records and compare the same provider across different routes.

See which routes break the pattern →
72% low income route penalty33 official UK corridors791 latest official UK service observations8 named provider comparisons
NEW DATA EDITION

The extra £2.10 paid by people who need cash

Cash collection adds about £2.10 to a £200 transfer after allowing for the company and destination. We then test how that premium sits beside account ownership and local payment access.

Read the cash comparison →
£2.10 adjusted cash premium17 tightly matched offers0.71 unbanked to cash correlation33 destination context panel
NOW COLLECTINGWho passes on a stronger pound?

A 90-day record of how quickly customer rates improve when sterling rises, and how quickly they worsen when it falls.

NEXT DATA PANELTen logos, perhaps two useful quotes

A route-level count of advertised companies against reproducible prices, including the providers that land within 1% of the daily winner.

RESEARCH TEAM

The names attached to this work

The checking desk produces the rate records. Finofin Limited is responsible for the published explanations and for correcting them when the evidence changes.

AR
Alon RajicPublisher and research leadBackground and responsibilities →
RG
Russell GousHead of contentBackground and responsibilities →